Answer:
<em>wellbeing </em>(or a similar word)
Explanation:
Essentially, these guidelines are there to protect the participants from harm/distress. Therefore, they are safeguarding the wellbeing of the participants.
Answer:
The mandate system was a compromise between the Allies' wish to retain the former German and Turkish colonies and their pre-Armistice declaration (November 5, 1918) that annexation of territory was not their aim in the war. ... All Class A mandates had reached full independence by 1949.
Explanation:
Answer: The strength of the Neuropsychological approach is that "IT FOCUSES ON HUMAN BRAIN DAMAGED PATIENT". therefore the study of damaged human brain is the strength of the Neuropsychological approach.
The weaknesses of the Neuropsychological approach is that "IT USES A PREVIOUS CASE STUDY TO FOCUS ON HUMAN BRAIN DAMAGE". This means that he uses a previous case to conclude the solution of a recent brain damage.
Explanation: Neuropsychology is the study of psychological effect of a damaged brain in patient suffering from brain damage. It aim is to benefit the patient, by using previous case to study each case. It usually deals with case studies and quasi experimental.
Because it's optimum objective is to benefit it's patient, we can say that it's strength is stronger than its weakness.
Jack Block found that 23-year-old who described themselves as being politically conservative were likely to have been described as <u>guilty and anxious</u> at age 3.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Guilt is a feel expressed by the person, when he/she feels they had done something wrong. A person will feel guilt, when he violates his own ethics or morality. The unethical behavior of the person may cause physical or psychological pain to others.
The person feels nervous and uncomfortable when he is anxious. This kind of person is conservative in nature. They are always seen to be worried and stressed. Anxious people often gets fear on facing the crowd.
Answer:C)valid
Explanation:
A valid argument is an argument whose conclusions can be traced or related to the premise of such an argument.
Any argument whose conclusions can be linked up with the initial assumptions made by the premise if invalid.
The action of the college administrator of trying to assess whether an admissions test accurately predicts how well applicants will perform at his school the College administrator is concerned whether there is a valid Relationship.
