I think it is Phytoplankton.
With the increase or decrease of the prices of substitutes, the demand of the substitute goods also decreases or increases.
Explanation:
Substitutes are the products which can be used in place of another product. For example, a cup of coffee can be taken instead of a cup of tea, or Coke can be taken instead of Pepsi.
Change in the price of Substitutes can affect the demand of other substitutes. If the price of a product increases, then the demand of its substitute increases, and if the price of the product decreases, then the demand of its substitute also decreases.
We can understand this relation with an example. Suppose the product is tea. The substitute of tea is coffee. If the price of tea increases, then people will definitely move towards the substitute, which is coffee. This will increase the demand for coffee. Similarly, if the price of tea decreases, people will buy more tea than coffee, which will decrease the demand for coffee. This is how the substitutes affect demand of each other.
Learn more about substitutes at:
brainly.com/question/12566919
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
obedience and punishment driven
Explanation:
Obedience and punishment driven is one of the Kohlberg's six stages of Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning. in this stage, the person involved focus on the direct consequences of their actions on themselves. That is, an action is wrong if there are consequences (like punishment) associated with the action. This is the reason why Austin could not hit his sister, because, hitting her would result in his mom spanking him. The spanking would serve as a punishment for hitting his sister. Therefore, this is typical of obedience and punishment. If Austin did not hit his sister, he wont be spanked, but if he did, he would be spanked
I believe the answer is: <span>Astrid sends her daughter to her room alone when she misbehaves.
Negative punishment refers to a form of punishment that initiated in order to condition a certain individual to change his/her undesirable behavior.
</span>It could be seen when a person is given a punishment when they're doing something that considered as 'wrong'
I believe the correct answer is fear can be learned via classical conditioning, and that fear can be generalized.
During this experiment, Watson presented Albert with a white mouse and a scary sound, so every time Albert saw a mouse, he was scared by the sound. Over time, he learned to be afraid of the mouse because he was expecting to be scared by the sound, even though the sound may not come. Thus, he learned to be afraid, and the fear was generalized not only to the mouse, but to anything white.
