Answer: John's Savings account balance declined by $50 and his Checking account balance increased by $50
Explanation:
The checking account statement shows that there was an online funds transfer from Savings into the checking account.
The checking account will therefore increase by $50 because money was transferred into it and therefore added to its balance. The savings account on the other hand, will reduce by the same amount because it transferred the money into another account.
Answer:
C) there is at least one fixed factor of production.
<u>Multiple-choice options</u>
A) there is increasing scarcity of factors of production.
B) the price of extra units of a factor is increasing.
C) there is at least one fixed factor of production.
D) capital is a variable input.
Explanation:
he law of diminishing marginal returns cites that adding extra input while maintaining the others fixed will cause the overall output to decrease . Adding one more production input while keeping the rest intact decreases the marginal returns and increases the average production cost.
The law only applies where there at least one fixed input. When the firm uses more of the variable input, the firm's marginal product will eventually decrease.
Free market means you can choose what path you want to take such as a career or future. therefore the consumers control the market. that is why share prices go up and down because of s and d. the suplly and demand comes from the consumer wanting to purchase and sell. Therefore a free market economy is an economy controlled by consumers
<span>That is very true. They are the best people to manage the business since they started it and should know exactly how it needs to be run. If they don't know then their business will more than likely fail for poor management. They may hire other managers but they should always be the decision makers</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
