Answer:
Confront theories predictions with evidence
Explanation:
To test economic theories, economists would observe real behavior and test it with data from the real world. Which would in turn provide evidence based on what is being tested. Confronting theories predictions with evidence is a pointer to the fact that economic theories are verifiable and their validity can be tested.
The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
Age: 15
oldest age: 16
siblings: 1
Answer:
$50
Explanation:
Net income will be the difference between the selling price and the Cost price.
Cost price is $1000
net profit margin is 5%, selling price will be
=$1000 + profit margin
= $1000 + (5/100 x 1000)
=$1000 + $50
=$1050
Net income = $1050 -$50
=$50
Answer:
The answer is letter C.
Explanation:
The correct statement is If M and W merge, then the merged firm MW should have a WACC that is a simple average of M's and W's WACCs.