Answer:
You probably should have gave them 2/3 of what they did. I wouldn't call you a scammer, but it was not fair.
45 because, the short side is half of the big size. That might be correct. But I'm almost positive
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
lim(t→∞) [t ln(1 + 3/t) ]
If we evaluate the limit, we get:
∞ ln(1 + 3/∞)
∞ ln(1 + 0)
∞ 0
This is undetermined. To apply L'Hopital's rule, we need to rewrite this so the limit evaluates to ∞/∞ or 0/0.
lim(t→∞) [t ln(1 + 3/t) ]
lim(t→∞) [ln(1 + 3/t) / (1/t)]
This evaluates to 0/0. We can simplify a little with u substitution:
lim(u→0) [ln(1 + 3u) / u]
Applying L'Hopital's rule:
lim(u→0) [1/(1 + 3u) × 3 / 1]
lim(u→0) [3 / (1 + 3u)]
3 / (1 + 0)
3
Answer:

<u>given:</u>

to find the output, replace x with the given integer.
solve:




Answer:
The term was obtained by grouping and adding the all x terms in the expression.
Step-by-step explanation:
The example has already provided this step:
(x -4) +(x +1) +(¼x +5)= 
Thus, the question is asking how is
derived from the expression.
The attached picture shows the intermediate working to arrive at the final perimeter expression.
This expression is later equated to 20 since it is given that the perimeter of the traingle is 20 inches.