Well 31 is not able to go any were and it has to stay 31
Answer for the above question is <u>option C</u>
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
<u>Option C -</u> It's a quadrilateral but not a rhombus . As we know rhombus has congruent sides while its two angle can't be measured 120 degrees but in option C it seems two vertically opposite angles of to be 120 degrees. In rhombus opposite angles are same while adjacent angles are supplementary. All options except C are the rhombus of congruent sides.
Did somebody say you're supposed to draw the graph of the equation ?
Is that the assignment ?
OK. Just like every other equation you need to graph, get it in the
standard form, where 'y' is all alone on one side, and everything else
is on the other side. When you do that, you'll be able to spot the slope
and y-intercept of the line, or get some points, or whatever you want.
4y + 12 = 0
Subtract 12 from each side: 4y = -12
Divide each side by 4: y = -3
There's the equation you can handle.
The y-intercept is -3, and the slope is zero.
Would you like some points ? OK. Pick a couple of values for 'x',
and calculate the value of 'y' for each one:
The first value I picked for 'x': x = 72
The equation is y=-3, so when x=72, y=-3. The point is (72, -3)
The second value I picked for 'x' is: x = 1
The equation is y=-3, so when x=1, y=-3. The second point is (1, -3).
The third value I picked for 'x' is 4 billion.
The equation is y=-3, so when x=4 billion, y=-3. The third point is (1, -3).
Do you see what's going on here ? Your original equation didn't even
have 'x' in it, so we could tell right away that when the graph is drawn,
the value of 'y' at every point can't depend on 'x'.
When we simplified the equation and got it in standard form, we found that
the slope of the graph is zero. That means the graph doesn't rise or fall ...
it's just a horizontal line. Sure enough, the height of points on the line
doesn't depend on 'x'. The value of 'y' at every point on the line is -3 .
Answer: The correct answer is option B: There are between 15 and 20 green pieces in all 5 packages
Step-by-step explanation: The most important factor has been given which is, "Which statement about the candy pieces in the remaining packages is best supported by this information."
The information given is such that, the first package she opened had 4 green pieces and on this basis we can safely assume that all other packages have 4 green pieces as well. The second package had 3 green pieces and this based on this too we can safely assume that all other packages had 3 green pieces. Hence, all 5 packages can either have a total of 4 x 5 green candies which equals a total of 20 green pieces or, all 5 packages can have a total of 3 x 5 green candies which equals a total of 15 green pieces.
So according to Suzi's experiment, there are between 15 and 20 green pieces in all 5 packages.
Answer:
scale factor = 
Step-by-step explanation:
the scale factor is the ratio of corrresponding sides. image to original.
scale factor = 
= 
=
