"They often make bad choices that are exciting to read about" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>best explains why complex characters appeal to readers. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the fourth option or option "D". I hope it helped you.</span>
Answer:
It depends. Some kids drink on their own & their parents have no idea so those parents shouldn't be jailed, they don't control their children's actions, even though they are their parents & they should know everything, they don't, their kids are slick & know how to hide it, obviously.
Explanation:
Answer:
Question 5: a. circular reasoning
Both statements fail to prove themselves valid. They rephrase the wording from earlier in the claim.
Question 6: Either-or
The first claim assumes the only way to be a bad doctor is to get your medical degree overseas. It implies that you are either a skilled doctor or one who was educated overseas. In reality, there are more options. The second claim provides two options: a career that benefits humanity or one that makes them enough money. This is a fallacy because a career can be both rather than solely one or the other.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15911568#readmore
Explanation:
The figurative language used in the excerpt "The greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds" is the <u>paradox</u>.
The paradox connects in the same situation two opposite things in a construct phrase that together acquires sense: although it seems more logical that when knowledge increases, ignorance reduces or fades away, the meaning of this sentence is that the more we know, the more we discover that yet we have much to learn; Then, the connection of the increasing knowledge with the unfolding ignorance makes sense.
Incomplete and unclear question. However, I infer you are referring to the article "The Myth of the Exploited Student-Athlete" by Barbara Osborne.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The author throughout the article analyses the claims that student-athletes are under-compensated by their institutions.
Furthermore, ln a sense the institutions "are making more money" than the students by exploiting the athletes through lower pay.
