All categories

3 years ago

Why does stock have more potential for higher returns than bonds?

Mathematics

1 answer:

morpeh [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Stocks have historically delivered higher returns than bonds because there is a greater risk that, if the company fails, all of the stockholders' investment will be lost.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this will help

You might be interested in

Please help!!10 points!!

ANTONII [103]

Answer:

the hell Well fist off you need to be able to graph to if you have a phone and look it up.

3 0

2 years ago

Ms. Jan brought in cookies for her class. She gave out half of them in the morning. At lunch, she gave out 12 more. She then had

Olegator [25]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

if she had 10 left at the end and you add the other half from lunch which is 12, then that gives you 22. Since before lunch she had half (22), all you gotta do is add the other half which is 22. 22+22=44 and that's your answer.

6 0

3 years ago

This should be easy

Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

it's the holy number jesus christ can confirm

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Fran works due north of home. Her husband Juan works due east. By the time Fran is 5 miles from home the distance between them i

lana66690 [7]

If I understood the question correctly, let's set the coordinates (5,5) from the origin (the home). To find the longer side of the triangle, (the distance between the husband and wife), we use A squared * B squared= C squared. 25*25=625, the square root of 625 is 25. So the distance between the husband and wife would be 25 miles. Therefore, one mile less than their distance would be 24 miles. To answer your question, Juan is 24 miles from home.

3 0

3 years ago

The nutrition label for Oriental Spice Sauce states that one package of sauce has 1100 milligrams of sodium. To determine if the

lora16 [44]

Answer:

We conclude that the sodium content is same as what the nutrition label states.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the nutrition label for Oriental Spice Sauce states that one package of sauce has 1100 milligrams of sodium.

The FDA randomly selects 40 packages of Oriental Spice Sauce and determines the sodium content. The sample has an average of 1088.64 milligrams of sodium per package with a sample standard deviation of 234.12 milligrams.

Let $\mu$ = average sodium content.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $\mu$ = 1100 milligrams {means that the sodium content is same as what the nutrition label states}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $\mu$ $\neq$ 1100 milligrams {means that the sodium content is different from what the nutrition label states}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample t test statistics as we don't know about population standard deviation;

T.S. = $\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}$ ~ $t_n_-_1$

where, $\bar X$ = sample average sodium content = 1088.64 milligrams

s = sample standard deviation = 234.12 milligrams

n = sample of packages of Oriental Spice Sauce = 40

So, test statistics = $\frac{1088.64-1100}{\frac{234.12}{\sqrt{40}}}$ ~ $t_3_9$

= -0.307

The value of z test statistics is -0.307.

Since, in the question we are not given the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now, at 0.05 significance level the t table gives critical values of -2.0225 and 2.0225 at 39 degree of freedom for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistics lies within the range of critical values of t, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the sodium content is same as what the nutrition label states.

3 0

3 years ago