Answer: Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct option: A $50 billion decrease in government spending would be the most contractionary fiscal policy.
A. Increase the taxes by $40 billion is also a contractionary fiscal policy but it doesn't have a greater impact than decreasing the government spending by $50 billion.
B. It is an expansionary fiscal policy.
D. There are both expansionary fiscal policy by decreasing taxes by $10 billion and contractionary fiscal policy by decreasing government spending by $40 billion. But it doesn't have much impact as the option (C) is having.
Therefore, Option (C) is having the most contractionary fiscal policy.
Answer:
<u>A Strategic Alliance</u>
Explanation:
A Strategic Alliance refers to a combined effort or activities of two firms so as to strengthen their market position and yet at the same time maintain their individual separate corporate existence.
It represents a mutually beneficial agreement between two corporate firms under which, terms are less binding and stringent than a joint venture.
The purpose behind such an alliance could be, expansion, product line improvement or together gain a competitive advantage.
Such an alliance helps both businesses achieve a common goal driven by mutual assistance and pooling of resources.
In the given case, the tie up between Caffery computer corp. and Chicago desktop to sell computer locking systems alongside computers, would be termed a strategic alliance, since such an arrangement would benefit both, reduce competition for each with collective gain w.r.t market share.
The answer is that
"<span>
the change in accounts receivable is subtracted from net income".</span>
<span>When the indirect method is used, the starting
point is the net income and it is transformed to cash flows from operational actions
by adding back losses and subtracting gains so that these quantities are removed.</span>
Everything but the twizlers I don’t like them lol sorry -
Answer:
Infant industry.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Company Z is a U.S. company that is the first in this country to produce a good that is already produced in many foreign countries and sold in the United States. Most likely, the argument it will voice in its attempt to be protected from foreign competition is the infant industry argument.
An infant industry can be defined as an industry that is still in its early stages of development and as such are not capable of competing with foreign companies.
<em>Hence, according to the infant industry theory the argument would be that infant industries should be offered some kind of protection from competitors in other industries either foreign or local until they mature and develop a good and reputable economies of scale. </em>
