Pre image
A:3,0
B:1,-2
C:3,-5
D:7,-1
Image
A:9,0
B:3,-6
C:9,-15
D:21,-3
<u>Explanation:</u>
1. a) Null hypothesis: There is <em>no</em> statistically significant relationship between the mouse grimace scale and the amount of pain felt by mouse.
b) Alternate hypothesis: There is a statistically-significant relationship between the mouse grimace scale and the amount of pain felt by mouse.
2. Yes, because a statistically significant data implies that there is sufficient evidence to believe the study, based on the results of the findings.
3. No, since the variables are different in this case. Here we are dealing with a non-painful solution so there may be no sample correlation as extreme as that found in the original study.
4. Possibly, because every hypothesis is an assumption until it is proven. Thus, in every statistical research, there may be different findings.
Answer:
A. 24 in
Step-by-step explanation:
Because side GF was multiplied by 4, the rest can be calculated in that same manner.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We can set up the following system of equations:
, where 
is the number of dimes she has and 
is the number of nickels she has.
Multiplying the second equation by -5 and adding both equations lets us isolate and solve for :
Plugging 
into any of the two equations will let us solve for :
.
Therefore, she has 14 nickels.
Answer:
μy = $6.56 ; σy = 2.77
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data :
Mean μx= $8.56
Standard Deviation σx ≈ 2.77
Profit, Y on pizza with current promo :
Price off on pizza = $2
Y = x - 2
μx = E(x) = $8.56
μy = μ(x - 2)
μy = μx - $2
μy = $8.56 - $2
μy = $6.56
For the standard deviation of y
σx ≈ 2.77
σy = σ(x - 2)
σy = σx - 2
Constants are treated as 0 for standard deviation
σy = 2.77
