The answer is: B. <span>negative reinforcer; positive reinforcer
Negative reinforcer refers to the type of stimulus that act as a punishment that discourage an individual from making a certain response/action.
Positive reinforcer on the other hand is a type of stimulus that act as a reward that encourage an individual to do a certain action.</span>
i donnt know it sorry try again
B is the correct answer
When you vote, that's the best way to "participate" in the democratic system
Answer:
For not receiving any financial help from the grantees, senator Kauffman hands were not tied neither was he unburdened or pressured by the outside forces to undermine the white collar crime investigations.
Step-by-step explanation
In the US the elites that is the political class, bankers and the individual funders do have influence over the State representatives due to their huge donations used in campaigns. In this case Senator Kaufman did not campaign but rather was appointed hence he did not receive any financial help from any third party, therefore his only commitment was to deliver the work he was appointed for.
This differs from other leaders because their allegiance is swayed as they try to please their donors for example; elected officials who received donations from NRA went against the bills that would limit their access to particular weapons.
Answer:
b. can appoint officials to the federal bureaucracy with the approval of the Senate
Explanation:
The US president has the prerogative of appointing officials to various positions in the state bureaucracy, with the consent of the Senate. The fact that the Senate has to approve is a way to prevent the president from nominating people who are not properly qualified or who are submissive to the president. For example, the president nominates an economist to head the Federal Reserve, and that economist will be sabbathed and approved by the Senate, which will ascertain the economist's technical qualifications and ability to work independently.
