Step 1:
first let us convert the two decimals into fractions.
0.36=36/100 (since there are two digits after decimal point we divide by 100)
2.4=24/10 (since there are one digit after decimal point we divide by 10)
now we can multiply the fractions
×
multiplying numerator with numerator and denominator with denominator:

=
Now we can convert this back to decimal
864/1000=0.864, moving decimal three digits to the left since we have three zeros in the denominator that is 1000.
Answer=0.864
Answer:
(c, b)
Step-by-step explanation:
Add the coordinates together and divide by 2
x coordinates: 2c + 0 = 2c, divided by 2 = c
y coordinates: 0 + 2b = 2b, divided by 2 = b
Answer:
a) ![\mathrm{E}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{\mathrm{H}}^{5} \frac{200}{101-i}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathrm%7BE%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7B%5Cmathrm%7BH%7D%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B200%7D%7B101-i%7D)
b) ![\mathrm{Var}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{k=1}^{5} \frac{(200)^{2}}{(101-i)^{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathrm%7BVar%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%28200%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B%28101-i%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
The lifetimes of the individual items are independent exponential random variables.
Mean = 200 hours.
Assume, Ti be the time between (
)st and the
failures. Then, the
are independent with
being exponential with rate
Therefore,
a) ![E[T]=\sum_{i=1}^{5} E\left[\tau_{i}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BT%5D%3D%5Csum_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20E%5Cleft%5B%5Ctau_%7Bi%7D%5Cright%5D)

![\therefore \mathrm{E}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{\mathrm{H}}^{5} \frac{200}{101-i}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctherefore%20%5Cmathrm%7BE%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7B%5Cmathrm%7BH%7D%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B200%7D%7B101-i%7D)

The variance is given by, ![\mathrm{Var}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{i=1}^{5} \mathrm{Var}[T]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathrm%7BVar%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cmathrm%7BVar%7D%5BT%5D)
![\therefore \mathrm{Var}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{k=1}^{5} \frac{(200)^{2}}{(101-i)^{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctherefore%20%5Cmathrm%7BVar%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%28200%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B%28101-i%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D)
Answer: a because it’s using the commutative property of addition meaning it’s the same mathematical statement, it’s just moved around
Step-by-step explanation: