1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vaieri [72.5K]
2 years ago
7

Kasapreko Company Limited is a wholly Ghanaian-owned company with branches in Nigeria, South Africa and Germany. With relevant e

xamples, explain the eclectic paradigm that Kasapreko might have fulfilled, before venturing international.
Business
1 answer:
Tema [17]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

It should be understood that Kasapreko company limited is a Ghanian company that specialises in the production of herbal beverage products.

And the primary aim or goal of the company is to be able to have branches in every country of the world. But before this could be achieved, the company must be able to meet the demands of its country of production, and be able to attain or collect the necessary documents that will allow it to have branches outside the country it was founded. It must also be able to acquire the necessary licenses to operate in its desired countries.

Presently, the company has branches in countries like Nigeria and South Africa.

You might be interested in
Therrell Corporation has two divisions: Bulb Division and Seed Division. The following report is for the most recent operating p
amm1812

Answer:

a. For Bulb = $183,418.92

b. For Seed = $96,759.49

c. Break even = $336,144.74

Explanation:

Sales = Bulb Division + Seed Division

= $234,000 + $156,000

= $390,000

Variable Expense = Bulb Division + Seed Division

= $60,840 + $32,760

= $93,600

Contribution margin for bulb = Sales - Variable

= $234,000 - $60,840

= $173,160

Contribution margin for Seed division = Sales - Variable

= $156,000 - $32,760

= $123,240

Total = $390,000 - $93,600

= $296,400

Division Income for bulb = contribution margin - Traceable fixed expenses

= $173,160 - $135,730

= $37,430

Division Income for seed division = contribution margin - Traceable fixed expenses

= $123,240 - $76,440

= $46,800

Total of Division income = $296,400 - $212,170

= $84,230

Common Fixed expenses = $25,980 + $17,320

= $43,300

Income = Total of Division income - Common Fixed expenses

= $84,230 - $43,300

= $40,930

Contribution margin ratio for bulb = Contribution ÷ Sales × 100

= $173,160 ÷ $234,000 × 100

= 74.00%

Contribution margin ratio for seed = Contribution ÷ Sales × 100

= $123,240 ÷ $156,000 × 100

= 79%

Total Contribution margin ratio for bulb and seed  = Contribution ÷ Sales × 100

= ($173,160 + $123,240) ÷ $390,000 × 100

= $296,400 ÷ $390,000 × 100

= 76%

a and b. Division’s break-even in sales dollars = Fixed costs ÷ Contribution margin ratio

For Bulb = $183,418.92

For Seed = $96,759.49

c. company’s overall break - even in sales dollars

= (212170 + 43300) ÷ 76%

= $336,144.74

5 0
3 years ago
Blossom Company purchased equipment for $303,200 on October 1, 2020. It is estimated that the equipment will have a useful life
givi [52]

Answer:

Answer A  =  $9,000  

Answer B  =  $6,400  

Answer C   =  $7,632  

Answer D   =  $54,000  

Answer E   =  $71,063

Explanation:

[ find attachments for complete solutions]

Note: Complete question is attached to the attachment section

5 0
3 years ago
Olivia is a florist who specializes in roses.
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

Olivier does have sufficient contract rights because she already signed a 5 year contract to supply as many roses as possible to Juan. Juan cannot come at the end of two years and break the contract

Explanation:

1. 1. What contract rights and remedies, if any, does Olivia have against Juan?

The most important point of focus from the aspect of the law and statute of frauds is that from the scenario it was stated clearly that ''She has a <u>five-year written contract with Juan to sell him as many roses as he needs for his wedding chapel.</u> ''

Olivier does have sufficient contract rights because she already signed a 5 year contract to supply as many roses as possible to Juan. Juan cannot come at the end of two years and break the contract

2. What contract rights and remedies, if any, does Olivia have against Ann?

The scenario states clearly that ''Ann emailed Olivia an order for <u>"1,000 white stems''</u> and ''Olivia instead sent orchids, the only "white stems" available at the time.''

Hence Olivia fulfilled Ann's orders and Ann has absolutely no case at all. Olivia has acted in accordance to Ann's request and has full rights to claim her payment.

3. What defenses, if any, do Juan and Ann have?

In summary the defenses of both parties are weak

1. Juan has a defense of unforeseen financial difficulties but this will be insufficient to override a written contract

2. Ann assumed that Olivia would send roses but assumption does not work in the eyes of the law but written agreements.

Additionally, Ann could argue that Olivia should have communicated the price of the orchids at the point of processing Ann's orders.

6 0
3 years ago
When interacting with a small number of rival​ firms, a manager uses a?
vaieri [72.5K]
It is known as a Strategy. An association's methodology that joins the greater part of its advertising objectives into one extensive arrangement. A decent showcasing procedure ought to be drawn from statistical surveying and concentrate on the correct item blend keeping in mind the end goal to accomplish the most extreme benefit potential and maintain the business.
6 0
3 years ago
There are numerous exceptions to the parol evidence rule, with perhaps the most common being when ________ evidence serves to cl
jeka94

The parol evidence rule has many exceptions, with possibly the most prevalent one being when <u>oral</u> evidence serves to clear up a(n) <u>ambiguous</u> part of an  agreement.

More about the parol evidence rule:

The parol evidence rule is a principle of Anglo-American common law that controls the types of evidence that parties to a contract dispute may provide in an effort to ascertain the precise terms of the contract.

The parol evidence rule also prohibits parties who have reduced their agreement to a finalized written instrument from adding further evidence later on as proof of a different intent regarding the contract terms, such as the content of oral exchanges from earlier in the negotiation process.

Learn more about the parol evidence rule here:

brainly.com/question/15733971

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Sosa Corporation recently reported an EBITDA of $31.9 million and net income of $9.7 million. The company had $6.8 million in in
    10·1 answer
  • Countries which export more than they import (i.e., which have a surplus in their balance of trade) still will have a $0 balance
    14·1 answer
  • An example of an ongoing cost is _____.
    7·2 answers
  • Dramatic shifts in the workplace call for workers that can
    13·1 answer
  • On January 1, 2021, Splash City issues $320,000 of 8% bonds, due in 15 years, with interest payable semiannually on June 30 and
    10·1 answer
  • HURRY On Monday, Monahan accepts a job at Acme for $50,000 per year. He is to begin work on Friday. On Tuesday, Acme informs him
    6·1 answer
  • On December 30 of the current year, Leigh Museum, a nongovernmental not-for-profit entity (NFP), received a $7 million donation
    5·1 answer
  • The constraint at Rauchwerger Corporation is time on a particular machine. The company makes three products that use this machin
    13·1 answer
  • An equitable remedy requiring exactly the performance that was specified in a contract; usually granted only when monetary damag
    12·1 answer
  • Manufacturers sometimes use misleading terms on grain products. Which is the first ingredient term on a label to be a significan
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!