Answer:
The hourly pay for the lifeguards in 2001 was of $6.31.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hourly pay, in dollars, in t years after 1995, is given by the following equation:
What was the hourly pay for the lifeguards in 2,001?
2001 is 2001 - 1995 = 6 years after 1995. So this is P(6).
The hourly pay for the lifeguards in 2001 was of $6.31.
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.