It approximately the answer (17) if rounded
1526273784483883 the form of the h=
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The dealing of the cards can be seen in the following way:
We first have to choose which 7 cards are going to be dealt to the 1st player. So we have to pick 7 cards out of the 52 available cards. This can be done in 
ways. Now that we have chosen which 7 cards are going to be dealt to the 1st player, we have to choose which 2 of them are going to be the hidden ones. So we have to pick 2 cards out of the 7 cards to be the hidden ones. This can be done in 
ways. At this point we now know which cards are being dealt to the 1st player, and which ones are hidden for him. Then we have to choose which 7 cards to deal to the 2nd player, out of the remaining ones. So we have to pick 7 out of 52-7=45. (since 7 have been already dealt to the 1st player). This can be done in 
. Then again, we have to pick which 2 are going to be the hidden cards for this 2nd player. So we have to pick 2 out of the 7. This can be done in ways. Then we continue with the 3rd player. We have to choose 7 cards out of the remaining ones, which at this point are 52-7-7=38. This can be done in 
. And again, we have to choose which ones are the hidden ones, which can be chosen in ways. Finally, for the last player, we choose 7 out of the remaining cards, which are 52-7-7-7=31. This can be done in 
ways. And choosing which ones are the hidden ones for this player can be done in ways. At the end, we should multiply all our available choices on each step, to get the total choices or total ways to deal the cards to our 4 players (since dealing the cards is a process of several steps with many choices on each step).
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
Supplementary angles are two angles which sum up to 180 degrees while complementary angled are those the sum is 90 degrees. Therefore, the complementary of 41.4 is 90-41.4 = 48.6 and the supplement would be 180-41.4= 138.6.
