Rates for corporate outings is NOT an example of an FPRA rate
Explanation:
The FPRA is an agreement between an entrepreneur and a governmental agency in which some indirect charges are determined over a set period of time. All such rates are price forecasts used for cost agreements and contract changes.
By using an FPRA the contracting system can be accelerated by removing the need for audit and analysis of rates. The Contracting Officer (COO) oversees the prices of the contracting party. The ACO should always be asked any questions about the prices. After a FPRA is reached, a copies of the agreement should always be provided for in any ensuing proposal.
Answer:
three
Explanation:
The Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) applies to home loans. It requires lenders to disclose all costs related to a home loan, provides rescission rights for some transactions, and impose restrictions on home equity credits. But the TILA cannot set the interest rates or other fees charged by the lender, it only requires the lender to disclose the complete information, e.g. APR, monthly payments and amount financed.
Answer:
$12,000
Explanation:
The manufacturing company has a direct materials cost of $6
The company manufactures 2,000 unit
Therefore total direct material cost can be calculated as follows
= 2,000×6
= $12,000
Hence the total direct material cost of $12,000
Answer:
B) 60,100
Explanation:
Since months have passed between the bond issuance and October 31. The amortization of the premium received depends on the amount of interest recognized. When the effective interest method is used, interest expense is based on the yield rate and the beginning book value.
interest expense = ($1,000,000 + $62,000) x 10% x 6/12 = $53,100
interest payable = $1,000,000 x 11% x 6/12 = $55,000
the difference (bond premium) = $55,000 - $53,100 = $1,900
unamortized bond premium = $62,000 - $1,900 = $60,100
