I don’t necessarily have enough time to do the essay for you, because I have my own work to do. However, I can tell you right now that the best option to go with would be option B. There are more relations here, and all of the movements for rights are similar in many ways. A few various components you could include in your response are as follows:
1. The women’s rights movements were similar to Black civil rights movements because both were put at the bottom of the barrel and had to fight their way up to equality through protests, movements, and sometimes revolts if provoked.
2. They also are similar because there is a resemblance in how they were both treated; they both were seen more as property and merchandise rather than humans. This was even confirmed by the Dred Scott Decision and the 3/5 Compromise.
3. There also is a connection because most of the women who fought for their rights WERE black. Because of this double-disadvantage, they had to fight twice as hard and they knew as much, if not more, than anyone else did about having to fight for equality.
These are a few points to help you. For now, I must go. I wish you the best!
You can be more accurate with your strategy when you think first in terms of ... your decisions will be when you're deciding where to spend on advertising. ... instance, each individual platform is geared toward a certain audience. ... When you have a clearly defined audience and deliberately chosen media, ...
Answer:
What is the best memory you have?
(pls nothing inapropriate)
Explanation:
It will be 25 beacues you add 2 down is 2 and add 2+3 is 5 so is 25 in total
Answer:
Both Hobbes and Locke has different ideas about the social contract and the natural rights.
Explanation:
Locke disagreed with Hobbes about the social contract and the natural rights. According to Locke, social contract is a contract that the people in the state of nature transfer some of their rights to the government, while on the other hand, according to Hobbes, social contract is the mutual transferring of right and everyone has the right to everything. Hobbes was in favour of Absolutism. Absolutism is a system in which control of the state is in the hands of a single individual. Locke, on the other hand, favored a more open approach to state-building and against Absolutism.