PLEASE. MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST ANSWER.
Answer:
i believe so, 3k3 is just 3k to the third power so i think theyd be like terms still
The right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
Let be an <em>exponential</em> function of the form
, where
and
are <em>real</em> numbers. A <em>horizontal</em> asymptote exists when
, which occurs for
.
For this function, the <em>horizontal</em> asymptote is represented by
and to change the value of the asymptote we must add the <em>parent</em> function by another <em>real</em> number (
), that is to say:
(1)
In this case, we must use
to obtain an horizontal asymptote of -3. Thus, the right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
To learn more on asymptotes, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/8493280
14 fleece jackets can be made
Answer:
27
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you need to find the factor that coverts 8 to 72. I look as these problems as 3 to x and 8 to 72. To do this, divide 72 by 8, and that's what you'd multiply 3 with.
72/8 = 9
9 x 3 = 27