The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem
<h3>What is the angle theorem used?</h3>
We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.
Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.
In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.
Read more about Angle theorem at; brainly.com/question/24839702
#SPJ1
Answer:
question 1: answer is 4
question 2: answer is 1
Step-by-step explanation:
I think you dive 18.3 by 5 which gives you 3.66
I am quite confused what this problem asks about.
We are given that:
4,000 / 10 is equal to hundred / 10
I believe this problem is asking us how much in hundreds
is 4,000
Therefore the answer is: 40
Such that:
<span>4,000 / 10 = 40 hundreds / 10</span>
<span> (4,-2) (-3,2) (3,4) (1,1)
In reality, it is already a function, because for every x only one corresponding value of y.
We do not see any repeating values of x, so this set is already function. We do not have to remove anything.</span>