1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
3 years ago
9

In Sara's suit against Tim, their attorneys present the case to a judge and jury. The jury renders an advisory verdict. The judg

e then meets with the parties to encourage a settlement. This is
Law
1 answer:
Leto [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: a summary jury trial

Explanation:

In Sara's suit against Tim, their attorneys present the case to a judge and jury. The jury renders an advisory verdict. The judge then meets with the parties to encourage a settlement. This is a summary jury trial.

Summary jury trial is also referred to as an alternative dispute resolution. It is usually conducted in a single day, it is economical and typically used to settle civil disputes. ​It is a binding jury trial that is presided over by a judge and done before a panel that is usually made up of about six jurors.

You might be interested in
What have some departments done to eliminate unethical conduct by it's officers
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

In 2005, police misconduct in New Orleans had reached an all-time high. In the weeks before and after Hurricane Katrina, several high-profile beatings and unjustified shootings by police led to intense federal scrutiny of the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD), including a 2010 U.S. Department of Justice investigation and a 2013 federal consent decree to overhaul policies and promote greater transparency and more civilian oversight of the police force.

In 2017, the NOPD aspires to serve as a model for how to reduce police misconduct. Rather than standing silently by—or joining in on a fellow officer's brutality—New Orleans

6 0
3 years ago
According to NHTSA, in 2018 there was an alcohol-impaired fatality every….
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

50 minutes.

Explanation:

2018 NHTSA key findings:

■ In 2018 there were 10,511 fatalities in motor vehicle traffic crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher. This totaled 29 percent of all traffic fatalities for the year. (Note: It is illegal in every State to

drive with a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher.)

■ An average of 1 alcohol-impaired-driving fatality occurred every 50 minutes in 2018.

■ The estimated economic cost of all alcohol-impaired crashes (involving alcoholimpaired drivers or alcohol-impaired nonoccupants) in the United States in 2010 (the most recent year for which cost data is available) was $44 billion.

■ Of the 2018 traffic fatalities among children 14 and younger, 22 percent occurred in alcohol-impaired-driving crashes.

■ The 21- to 24-year-old age group had the highest percentage (27%) of drivers with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher in fatal crashes compared to other age groups in 2018.

■ The percentage of drivers with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher in fatal crashes in 2018 was highest for motorcycle riders (25%), compared to drivers of passenger cars (21%), light trucks (19%), and large trucks (3%).

■ The rate of alcohol impairment among drivers involved in fatal crashes in 2018 was 3.4 times higher at night than during the day.

■ In 2018 among the 10,511 alcohol-impaired driving fatalities, 67 percent (7,051) were in crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .15 g/dL or higher.

Source: NHTSA 2018 data

Hope that helps

6 0
2 years ago
Florida's progressive DUI laws take __________ into account.
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

B. prior DUI convictions

Explanation:

Florida's progressive DUI laws take prior DUI convictions into account.

7 0
3 years ago
Please answer this I’d hope you have a good day if you do so:)
Anna [14]

Answer:

it would be segregation  and free speech

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
10 sentences, what are the benefits of talking out problems rather than going to court? What is the difference
kap26 [50]

Answer:

Mainly, the greatest benefit of solving problems outside the judicial system is the cost, since every judicial process necessarily entails a high cost, both in taxes, costs, fees, etc. In addition, the resolution time is much longer, since it involves a whole series of procedural steps that necessarily imply a passage in time, which can be avoided through an alternative resolution of conflicts.

Those means of alternative dispute resolution include, among others, mediation and arbitration. Mediation, on the one hand, involves a series of meetings between the parties in conflict, with the assistance of a specialist, the mediator, who seeks to bring the parties closer together and achieve the resolution of the dispute. On the other hand, arbitration implies that the parties in conflict abide by the solution proposed by an impartial third party, the arbitrator, who will decide according to the rules of law or equity, as appropriate.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Are executive orders ever unconstitutional?
    14·1 answer
  • In a criminal case, the ______ plays the role of a plaintiff.
    5·1 answer
  • What do you mean by mandamus?<br><br>Will mark brainliest ( just have 2 more )<br><br>Thank you​
    6·2 answers
  • The rules an agency within the executive branch makes are called:
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between a full-service broker and a discount broker?
    7·2 answers
  • Which two sentences in the scenario show some of the symptoms of stress among law enforcement, correctional, and public security
    12·1 answer
  • Do the philosophies established in the "broken windows" section of the article hold up as true
    12·1 answer
  • What are some laws that are currently evolving in the united states.
    13·1 answer
  • Name at least two indicators that a driver must not turn right at this intersection.
    13·1 answer
  • How is the theme developed in Hamlet?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!