1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tresset [83]
3 years ago
8

Amicus curiae briefs: A. help experts testifying in court get their point across. B. provide a way to influence the court when e

xpert testimony is not allowed. C. summarize the questions raised by the jury during deliberation of a verdict. D. reflect scientists' lack of interest in the legal system.
Law
1 answer:
olchik [2.2K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B. Provides a way to influence the court when expert testimony is not allowed

Explanation:

Amicus Curiae briefs are filed by the people who have  interest in the subject matter of  the lawsuit but they are not party to the litigation. Amicus curae means "friend of the court" briefs. It helps to provide sympathetic advocate to address policy issues and expand the effects of a potentially important prior court opinion

Filing of amicus brief signals the court that the case is important and related to many issues apart form the litigants interests. e.g An amicus curae about public health speaks a lot about the health significance of the policies at stake.

You might be interested in
Laws created by Texas legislature are applied by police officers and courts. What is this called?
olasank [31]

Answer:

When a bill is passed in identical form by both the Senate and the House, it is sent to the president for his signature. If the president signs the bill, it becomes a law. Laws are also known as Acts of Congress. Statute is another word that is used interchangeably with law.

7 0
2 years ago
The marks shown in the land of this bullet are known as striations. These striations are
Kruka [31]

Answer:ummmmmmmm I think guns barbells lands idk don’t come at me I’m just trying to get free points

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What are the requirements of a criminal conspiracy? Provide an example of a conspiracy and explain how it meets the definition.
damaskus [11]

Answer:

Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.

Explanation:

Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.

7 0
3 years ago
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do forensic technicians typically collect blood evidence before picking up weapons and other evidence? Because the Federal R
alina1380 [7]

Answer:

2nd one.

Explanation:

blood evidence should be tested immediately before effected by the environment to collect dna and calculate blood splatter angles. blood is more reliable than weapons as we cant always prove it was in possession of the offender at the time. if its a ballistic weapon that can be tracked through the serial number the weapon is not first priority. as they are not effected greatly by the environment as bio fluids are.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Beethoven lost his hearing but continued to write music by doing what?
    9·1 answer
  • Why do the people do what they do in verse 31?
    6·1 answer
  • one way that national traffic and motor vehicle safety act helps keep drivers and passengers safe is by
    14·1 answer
  • Ali and Bob graduated from Kenyatta University in 2010. Ali set up a mobile phone business in Nairobi. Bob established a poultry
    13·1 answer
  • Why and How theories may be changed or replaced over time?
    12·1 answer
  • Feels like we're on the edge right now
    12·2 answers
  • FORUM DESCRIPTION
    15·1 answer
  • Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Peter Cannon Questions: [a] Why should judges care if attorneys submit plagiar
    15·1 answer
  • Which law or rules prevent or reduce injury in the event of a crash ?
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Under the Obama Administration, what did the Justice Department allow states to do in regards to marijuana?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!