1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maksim [4K]
3 years ago
11

HURRY ILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST!

Biology
1 answer:
Tju [1.3M]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I don’t necessarily suffer from the “CSI effect” because I know that what you see on TV isn’t what happens in reality. However, the one part that has caused me to fall into the “CSI effect” is that I thought the results were almost always, accurate and correct from a lab or test for example.

Explanation:  effects.....

1.It’s become more difficult to prosecute defendants

Today’s jurors want more hard evidence. They want the smoking gun and the DNA proof—the unmistakable proof that points to the perpetrator. But any legal professional will tell you this doesn’t always exist.

Some think this is why high-profile defendants like Casey Anthony and Robert Blake were acquitted in recent years. Circumstantial evidence and even eye-witness accounts don’t cut it in the shadow of the high-tech, flashy world of CSI and other shows. 21st century jurors are expecting sophisticated science to be included in every trial—even though it may not always reflect the reality of the case.

2.Jurors are becoming more knowledgeable

While CSI-viewers tend to have higher expectations for scientific evidence in trials, they also show patterns of superior legal knowledge compared to their non-CSI-watching counterparts. One survey indicated that CSI viewers were more likely to expect evidence relevant to a specific crime than non-CSI viewers. They also knew what type of evidence would be irrelevant to specific crimes.

However, more knowledgeable jurors isn’t always a good thing. Jurors may think they are more knowledgeable on forensic evidence than they truly are. They may be aware of forensic testing and its capabilities but not understand when it is appropriately used in a case.

3.It’s manipulating crime scenes

Criminals have access to the same television programming as the rest of us. Some believe the surplus in crime shows is changing their behavior as well. While these programs are not always entirely true, many of the proceedings are based upon facts.

Criminals are taking notes and becoming more skilled at covering their tracks. They know to wear gloves to avoid leaving fingerprints, and they know to use bleach to clean up incriminating evidence

4.Interest is increasing in the criminal justice field

If nothing else, crime shows are at least raising interest and awareness of the legal, medical and investigative professionals and what they do. Bringing the work of these often-overlooked criminal justice professionals to the public eye is introducing individuals to potential professional opportunities in the field.

You might be interested in
Pls help i dont understand :( Will give Brainliest + 25!!!
myrzilka [38]

Answer:A

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE ANSWER FIRST GETS BRAINLIEST
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

1. The numbers of amphibians are declining only in the high-risk areas of the world - False. Amphibians are declining all over the world, in which many are going extinct due to climate change and changes inside their ecosystem. Failure to adapt to the 'new' setting leads to their demise.

2. Many amphibian species are threatened, but none have recently become extinct. - False. Within the previous century, there has been documentation of either extinct or a high-chance of extinction due to failure to see any sign of existence.

3. The health of falcon populations in the 1960s indicated that pesticide use was harming the environment - True. Pesticide is generally made of poison that either kill or dissuade the pests to eat all of the crop. Any animals that falcons eat (primary consumers) that eat the pests infected by the pesticide, would in turn infect the falcon in a larger percentile, leading to death. This is a slow destruction of the Food web from the bottom up, and would lead to a collapse when one or more level of the food web is wiped out.

4. Amphibians have been part of life on Earth for only about 4 million years - False. This highly depends on the person's own beliefs, however, as the Big Bang theory has already been proved false, and school's only clutch onto it in hope.

5. Birds and fish are frequently used as indicator species - True. The usage of animals that are either primary or secondary consumers (but not producers are tertiary consumers) are good indicators of the other populations within the area. A shortage of the population can mean that the Apex has eaten way too much, and that the base animals may have overpopulated.

6. I do not have the selection, so I cannot answer it.

7. Amphibians are good indicators species, for they are secondary consumers, meaning that they consume other animals, and are also consumed by other animals.

8. Scientists can learn how certain amphibians breed with each other (mating), as well as what key factors they try to find in their environments when choosing breeding grounds. They also can then take notice on how the amphibians grow, and what factors may keep them from growing, or vice versa.

9. Additive causes means that a "cause" is added into the ecosystem, for example, the adding of pollution or other man-made waste, as well as the introduction of competing species against the native species, or an introduction of a new predator species that preys on the native one. This means that since there is a larger population of consumers, the base population of amphibians would slowly decrease.

10. Inductive reasoning allows for people (specifically scientists in this case) to try to find out about changes in a certain ecosystem by trying to prove the  hypothesis created and whether they are right or not. For example, the Inductive reasoning can be that "the Secondary Consumer's population is dropping". This reasoning (conclusion) would then have to be proved.

~

~

3 0
3 years ago
How do plants breathe
o-na [289]
Plants do not breathe! they give out carbon dioxide and absorb oxygen from the air that surrounds them.
3 0
3 years ago
In the 1520s, the Spanish explorer Cortes and his armies carried the virus that causes smallpox to NorthAmerica and South Americ
umka21 [38]

Answer:

I can't see the graph but I believe that the answer is H

7 0
3 years ago
How can we trace enhanced co2 atmospheric levels back to human activity? site;?
diamong [38]

There is no carbon dioxide balance in biomass output or input. There is no dynamic equilibrium since carbon dioxide is being released at various rates. Geologically carbon dioxide concentration was very high for a long time and high enough to preclude evolving oxygen breathes until when carbon dioxide was locked up in plant life and oxygen levels raised by cyanobacteria and algae.

Oceans release carbon dioxide or it absorbs less carbon dioxide which causes a rise in temperature which feeds back. More heat is lost through evaporation which is lost to upper atmosphere then land biomass starts to pick up.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The isomerization of citrate to isocitrate:A) is the only unnecessary step of the citric acid cycleB) protects cells from the to
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following does the human body not do to maintain homeostasis
    11·2 answers
  • FIRST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST
    11·2 answers
  • Jim plans to plant coffee beans on the farm. Coffee needs warm, moist, and sunny climate. It always snows for four months, start
    7·2 answers
  • How is it possible for one of the species in a mimicry relationship not to be aware of the other?
    10·1 answer
  • Phosphorylation is another word for glycolysis
    12·1 answer
  • Weigh 10 grams of sugar and then dissolve in 100 mL of water (2<br> tools).
    11·2 answers
  • Any one free?For talk any indian gìrl​
    14·1 answer
  • Carbon can be found in shells and
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a transgenic organism?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!