Answer:
that it is a cat :')
Step-by-step explanation:
remember, whisker = cat
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a = 3, b = -8
Step-by-step explanation:
Solving the first equation for y, we get ...
2y +16 = 6x . . . . . given
y = 8 +3x . . . . . . . divide by 2
y = 3x -8 . . . . . . . subtract 8
In order for the system of equations to have infinitely many solutions, the second equation must be the same as this:
y = ax +b
a = 3, b = -8
Because none of the points on the number line are above 0, we know that the points will be negative.
This eliminates the second and third choices, as they contain positive numbers.
The first point, A, is a number less than -0.5 or -1/2
The first choice matches A with -5/16, which is less than -0.5 or -1/2
Therefore, the fourth choice must be the correct answer.
Answer:
C.) 2x+3 = 12
Step-by-step explanation:
x+x=2x
2x-(-3) is 2x+3
Rate this brainliest
Answer:
a) Null and alternative hypothesis:

b) A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would mean a conclusion that the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, when in fact it is not.
c) The consequences would be that they would be more optimistic than they should about the result of the investment, expecting a proportion of students that is bigger than the true population proportion.
d) A Type II error is made when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. This would mean that, although the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, there is no enough evidence and it is concluded erroneously that the proportion is not significantly bigger than 10%
e) The consequences would be that the investment may not be made, even when the results would have been more positive than expected from the conclusion of the hypothesis test.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The hypothesis should be carried to test if the proportion of students that would eat there at least once a week is significantly higher than 10%.
Then, the alternative or spectulative hypothesis will state this claim: that the population proportion is significantly bigger than 10%.
On the contrary, the null hypothesis will state that this proportion is not significantly higher than 10%.
This can be written as:
