Answer:
Is the benefit worth the cost?
Explanation:
Environmental policies application has to lead to some economic cost.
When coming up with this policies, the effect that this policies shall have towards environmental protection shall be considered.
The cost and economic effect that this policies shall cause should also be looked at.
If a policy causes insignificant change towards environmental protection and at the same time the costs are too high, then the policy should be dropped.
If a policy has got significant impact and costs less, the it should be taken.
I think either rapid of human population growth or global warming
Cations are positive so they have less electrons than protons, while anions are negative so they have more electrons.
I think it’s m(C6H12O6) = 856 g
M(C6H12O6) = 12*6+1*12+16*6 = 180 g/mol
n(C6H12O6) = m/M = 856 g / 180 g/mol = 4.756 mol
n(CO2) = 6*4.756 = 28.536 mol
M(CO2) = 12+16*2 = 44 g/mol
m(CO2) = n*M = 28.536mol*44g/mol = 1255.584 g
The organism would be a secondary consumer and a carnivore. An example could be an snake in the following food chain: grass -> bunny -> snake
