Given that t<span>here
are 20 light bulbs in 5 packages.
The table to find the rate
that gives you the number of light bulbs in 3 packages is given as follows:
![\begin{tabular} {|c|c|c|c|c|c|} Light bulbs&4&8&12&16&20\\[1ex] Packages&1&2&3&4&5 \end{tabular}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%0A%7B%7Cc%7Cc%7Cc%7Cc%7Cc%7Cc%7C%7D%0ALight%20bulbs%264%268%2612%2616%2620%5C%5C%5B1ex%5D%0APackages%261%262%263%264%265%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D)
Three different ways in which the rate can be written are:
12 light bulbs to 3 packages
12 light bulbs : 3 packages
12 light bulbs / 3 packages
</span>
To round off a given number in decimals to one decimal place (1 dp), we simply take the figure right after the decimal and approximate the remaining after it. If the second number after the decimal is a significant number (5 and above) we make it 1 and add to the number right after the decimal. If its NOT a significant number, we simply disregard it. The solutions therefore are;
ANSWER:
Notice how the number in (1) becomes 0.7, after taking the next number (which is 9) and adding it as 1 to the number after the decimal (which is 6). The same applies to the number in (3).
Answer:
47.5%
Step-by-step explanation:
39/82 = .475 = 47.5%
Since g(h(x))=h(g(x))= x, hence functions h and g are inverses of each other
Given the functions expressed as:
In order to check whether they are inverses of each other, we need to show that h(g(x)) = g(h(x))
Get the composite function h(g(x))
Get the composite function g(h(x))
Since g(h(x))=h(g(x))= x, hence functions h and g are inverses of each other
Learn more on inverse functions here; brainly.com/question/14391067
Given Info: "The dashed triangle is the image of the solid triangle"
So the "before" is the large solid triangle and the "after" is the smaller dashed triangle.
The horizontal side of the solid triangle is 15 units. The corresponding side for the dashed triangle is 3 units. Dividing the two values gives: 3/15 = 1/5 = 0.2
Make this value negative. The reason why is due to the fact that we have a sort of reflection going on as we're scaling down the figure.
So the final answer is -0.2
