1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uysha [10]
3 years ago
7

Describe how removing the carnivore will effect the population of producers

Biology
1 answer:
pshichka [43]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

If there were no carnivores, the herbivore populations would explode and they will rapidly consume large amounts of plants and fungi, growing until there is not enough food to sustain them. Eventually, the herbivores would starve, leaving only those plants that were distasteful or poisonous to them.

Explanation:

Brainliest PLZ

You might be interested in
The study of which structure was instrumental in the formation of the modern cell theory?
Keith_Richards [23]

D. DNA molecule is the answer

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What pigment, only present in plants, makes photosynthesis possible?
aev [14]
C is your answer so pick c
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which microscope will be most useful for quickly estimating the number of red blood cells and the patients blood sample
Vlad1618 [11]
Answer:  the "compound light microscope" .
_________________________________________________________
4 0
3 years ago
Living fossils are creatures that are alive today and that bear a striking resemblance to extinct creatures found in the fossil
tia_tia [17]
I am not thinking of a creature but of a tree which is the gingko tree which was in existence back 200 million years ago and there is one on a street where we lived   in Vancouver BC and they grow in various parts of the world still. The coelocanth is a prehistoric fish which still lives in the sea also. I think that evolutionists would view such living 'fossils' as proof that these organisms were so well adapted to a wide range of environments or were able to find environments that they originally thrived in that they could survive so long. Also, probably the longer they survived changed conditions the tougher they would get. A creationist would say aha that shows that species don't change and evolve which of course would deny the overwhelming evidence of the change in species through time such as amongst man's ancestors.
5 0
3 years ago
SEND HELP ASAP PLEASE IM BEGGING
Pepsi [2]

The correct answers are 1, 2 and 4

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Stress is defined as force applied over a specific area. _______ is a type of stress that pulls rocks apart and produces _______
    7·1 answer
  • A small child gives a plastic frog a big push at the bottom of a slippery 2.0 meter long, 1.0 meter high ramp, starting it with
    7·1 answer
  • How can changes in one part of earth affect another part<br>​
    13·1 answer
  • What is more likely to become a fossil, a worm or a snail? <br> Why?
    11·2 answers
  • 5. Which of the following statements best describes the response of finches to drought on the Galapagos Islands?
    5·1 answer
  • Reproductive plants<br>​
    11·1 answer
  • What is the energy source which runs the electron transport chain?
    9·1 answer
  • How might our DNA separate Genes?
    6·1 answer
  • Pls give me the answer to the questions below
    12·1 answer
  • Why will other ecosystems be affected if freshwater ecosystems dry up?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!