The description of a party's agenda, plan, and philosophy is called the platform.
Question options
a. a lot of alternative relationships
b. few alternative relationships
c. high satisfaction
d. low satisfaction
Answer:
d. low satisfaction
Explanation:
John here a has a low satisfaction and is therefore considering other options that will satisfy him totally. If John had total satisfaction which would mean that he has zero costs and all benefits he would stick to the relationship so he moves from the relationship if he considers that there are fewer costs in a relationship with another person and can only stay in that relationship if it has the lowest costs and highest benefits compared to other relationships.
Answer:
The answer is - Optimistic
Explanation:
Explanatory style is the way in which we explain the events that happen to us in our lives, either good or bad. There is the pessimistic explanatory style and the optimistic explanatory style.
The optimistic explanatory style are characterized by explanations for negative outcomes as being due to unstable, specific and external causes so we do not blame ourselves 100% for things that go wrong, and that the negative events will end soon and they would not let it affect too many aspects of their lives. While positive outcomes are seen as being due to stable, global and internal causes.
Lara is using optimistic explanatory style therefore she tends to have more positive explanatory style as she takes credit for positive experiences, believes that the good things will last and they will favorably affect other aspects of her life.
The answer is the overconfidence effect which is a very well
documented cognitive bias. Cognitive biases are ways in which our thinking is inclined
commonly at a very unconscious level. The overconfidence effect is correlated
with another very common bias: conformation bias which is the tendency to only
account for information that supports our believes while ignoring the rest of
information. To summarize the over confident effect is the tendency to think
that our abilities are far greater than they actually are, and we often uses
the conformation bias to support this believe even in the face of very dramatic
negative evidence.
