Answer:
A) Those solutions may make the road safer, but increasing the driving age is proven to save significantly more lives, according to studies comparing different state laws.
Explanation:
Counterclaim are claim made to rebut a claim or statement and it is the opposite of Argument.
Considering the information provided, The solutions provided to reduce the occurrence of teen drivers accident is to increase the age limit and make the roads safe for everyone, is the Claim.
The counterclaim will be the alternative solution that can be provided for the claim, which is that there are other ways to prevent these incidence from happening, option C is an example of this, Any law that regulates teenage driving could save lives, whether it increases the driving age, increases the penalty for driving without a seat belt, or limits who can be in the car.
The possible and logical rebuttal to the counterclaim which support the claim is Option A
Those solutions may make the road safer, but increasing the driving age is proven to save significantly more lives, according to studies comparing different state laws.
During the industrial era living conditions were bad so therefore farmers had to leave the farms and find jobs in the city because working at the farm was no longer going to give them enough money to survive.
