1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
3 years ago
9

Need help on this!!! 6 points!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
kodGreya [7K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

it appears to be  FALSE....

f(g(x) = 3(13-2x) -7 = 39 - 6x - 7 = 32 - 6x

h(32-5x) = 6(32-6x)

= 192 - 36x

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
17.83 rounded to the nearest tenth
garri49 [273]
The answer would be 17.8  hope this help you

4 0
3 years ago
X(4-k)=p solve for k
SVEN [57.7K]
Distribute
4x-kx=p
minus 4x both sides
-kx=p-4x
divide both sides by -x
k=\frac{p-4x}{-x}
k=\frac{4x-p}{x}
7 0
3 years ago
Given the piecewise function above evaluate the following statements. (write "DNE" if the limit does not exist)
Sveta_85 [38]

By analyzing the graph of the function, we will see that:

  • a) DNE
  • b) 3
  • c) -1
  • d) 3
  • e) DNE
  • f) 2

<h3>How to get the limits of the given function?</h3>

Remember that when we take a limit to a given value, we approach to that value by two directions (from above and below) and see at which value the function approaches.

So, for the first limit we have:

x ⇒ -2

As you can see, if we approach from below the function tends to 4, while if we approach from above, the function tends to -1, which means that this limit does not exist. DNE.

x ⇒ 0

The function is continuous here, so the limit is equal to the value of the function in that point, which is 3

x ⇒ 2

If we approach from above and below we get the same number, which is -1, so the limit is equal to -1.

x = 2

Now we are directly evaluating the function in x = 2, and we can see that there is a jump such that f(2) = 3

x ⇒ 4

Here we have two asymptotes, one goes to infinity and the other to negative infinity, so this limit does not exist.

x ⇒ ∞

So we can't see how the function behaves for large values of x, so there is no way to answer this exactly.

If we suppose that the function does not change, we can see that we have a rational function in the right side of the image, so we can expect that as x tends to infinity, the function will tend asymptotically to 2.

Why 2?

Because the denominator becomes zero when x = 4, then when x = 5 the denominator is equal to 1.

At that point, the function is equal to 3, so the function is something like:

y = 1/(x - 4) + 2

If you want to learn more about limits, you can read:

brainly.com/question/5313449

5 0
2 years ago
Sue deposited $1,500 into two different accounts.
avanturin [10]

$915 I’m pretty sure

5 0
3 years ago
Help please will give brainlst
shtirl [24]

Answer: So I think its either c or a. I have not did this in a while so it might be incorrect.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help as soon as possible!
    6·1 answer
  • Is 3x+5 congruent to 5x-1
    12·1 answer
  • a family pass to the amusement park costs $54.using the distributive property , write an expression that can be used to find the
    15·2 answers
  • What is the slope of a line that has x intercept of 6 and a y intercept of -4
    11·1 answer
  • Finding the Slope: Identify the slope. Will give 5 points if correct​
    13·2 answers
  • Which value(s) below ma 6.05x - 12.5 = 48 Show all of your work. Ju box below. HELP ME PLEASE
    6·2 answers
  • Please help me i have no clue what the answer is :?
    9·2 answers
  • Jade types 40 words in 7 minutes. Andrew types 35 words in 6 minutes. Who is the faster typist?
    10·2 answers
  • 20 points free<br> How to make a cow bark
    10·1 answer
  • What is the function equation for the input/output table?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!