It's a rational number. 9 is a perfect square. What you have asked is written as -sqrt(9), which can be written as -sqrt(3*3) which is - 3. That's perfectly OK. What would not be OK is something like -sqrt(10) which is irrational because it cannot be represented as a fraction or a whole number or a repeating decimal or a decimal that terminates.
Answer:
y=mx+b
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope-intercepts formula, the y = y coordinate, m = slope, x = x coordinate, b = y intercept
The two cones are not congruent because one of the cones is oblique in nature.
<h3>What are congruent shapes?</h3>
Congruent shapes are identical in size and shape. To put it another way, if you hold an object or element in a mirror, the picture you get is congruent to the object.
However, two figures may seem to be identical, but one side or angle in one figure may deviate significantly from the other. The easiest technique to assess sides and angles to check if they are equivalent or congruent is to use markings on figures.
When we apply that technique to the two figures, we realized that the two cones are not congruent because one of the cones is oblique in nature, this resulted in a difference in the slant height of the cones.
Learn more about congruent figures here:
brainly.com/question/25837892
A Yes as the x values are all different
B f(x) = 5x + 14
when x = 2 , f(x) = 5(2) + 14 = 24
x = 5, f(x) = 39,
Each value of f(x) is greater than corresponding ones in the function in A.
when x = 9 f(x) = 59 which is greater than for first function ( =12)
First function is a decreasing while f(x) is increasing
C f(x) = 64 = 5x + 14
5x = 64 - 14 = 50
x = 10
0.647 rounded to the nearest tenth = 0.6
