The movement of naturalism was greatly influenced by the 19th-century ideas of Social Darwinism, which was in turn influenced by Charles Darwin's theories on evolution. Social Darwinism applied to the human environment the evolutionary concept that natural environments alter an organism's biological makeup over time through natural selection. Social Darwinists and naturalists cited this as proof that organisms, including humans, do not have free will, but are shaped, or determined, by their environment and biology. Naturalists argued that the deterministic world is based on a series of links, each of which causes the next (for more on these causal links, see Causal links and processes, below). In "To Build a Fire," London repeatedly shows how the man does not have free will and how nature has already mapped out his fate. Indeed, both times the man has an accident, London states "it happened," as if "it" were an inevitability of nature and that the man had played no role in "it." The most important feature of this deterministic philosophy is in the amorality and lack of responsibility attached to an individual's actions (see Amorality and responsibility, below).
I believe none of these options are correct. However, if you had to choose one, I would pick A - <span>Nina slid into her seat just as the bell rang and tried to catch her breath.
B, C, and D are incorrect because these are all examples of direct characterization, meaning that the other directly tells us what these people are like. This doesn't happen in A, which is why I would choose that option.
</span>
I say true since it says they "have a better chance at being successful" instead of a definite chance.
Well, I do not know what the "Kids at Work" text is but I will give you the best answer concerning this.
Industrialization changed the nature of children's work because it introduced them to jobs that are relatively easy but still require basic human skills to complete.
Children did not have to have much experience to work in factories as the tasks they did were pretty repetitive. This allowed more children to be able to work in factories (as they did not need an education).
However, there came some very scary consequences from industrialization. Although manufactured goods were now cheap and easy to produce, the labor needed was like I state earlier, not skill based for the most part.
This led to a large amount of people (including children) now working in these jobs which did not require skill and thus, because of the large amount of people needing jobs, the wages that were paid could be very. very low.
To add to this, the working conditions were very dangerous. Many workers and kids died from issues that the company could have fixed but chose not too because there was no safety regulation and it would cost unnecessary amounts of money.
Kids worked long hours because many families needed as much work put in as they could get because of the lack of job positions that paid well.
After a long time, we finally began to develop some rules regarding business as well as child labor.
The cold, hard truth about this though is that child labor is still very common in other countries and its a hard issue to stop. We even depend on it so although people may be against child labor, politicians know that the reason why prices are cheap are because of child labor and abusive systems like that.
Industrialization led to some dark, dark ways in which employers manipulated people
