Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the system is solvable in the first place, create an augmented matrix of coefficients from the equations. Then put the matrix into reduced row echelon form.
Example is attached.
"Demonstrate by solving the following system."
You need to provide the system of equations.
well, we know it's a rectangle, so that means the sides JK = IL and JI = KL, so
![\stackrel{JK}{3x+21}~~ = ~~\stackrel{IL}{6y}\implies 3(x+7)=6y\implies x+7=\cfrac{6y}{3} \\\\\\ x+7=2y\implies \boxed{x=2y-7} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{JI}{6y-6}~~ = ~~\stackrel{KL}{2x+20}\implies 6(y-1)=2(x+10)\implies \cfrac{6(y-1)}{2}=x+10 \\\\\\ 3(y-1)=x+10\implies 3y-3=x+10\implies \stackrel{\textit{substituting from the 1st equation}}{3y-3=(2y-7)+10} \\\\\\ 3y-3=2y+3\implies y-3=3\implies \blacksquare~~ y=6 ~~\blacksquare ~\hfill \blacksquare~~ \stackrel{2(6)~~ - ~~7}{x=5} ~~\blacksquare](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cstackrel%7BJK%7D%7B3x%2B21%7D~~%20%3D%20~~%5Cstackrel%7BIL%7D%7B6y%7D%5Cimplies%203%28x%2B7%29%3D6y%5Cimplies%20x%2B7%3D%5Ccfrac%7B6y%7D%7B3%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20x%2B7%3D2y%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7Bx%3D2y-7%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7BJI%7D%7B6y-6%7D~~%20%3D%20~~%5Cstackrel%7BKL%7D%7B2x%2B20%7D%5Cimplies%206%28y-1%29%3D2%28x%2B10%29%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B6%28y-1%29%7D%7B2%7D%3Dx%2B10%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%203%28y-1%29%3Dx%2B10%5Cimplies%203y-3%3Dx%2B10%5Cimplies%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsubstituting%20from%20the%201st%20equation%7D%7D%7B3y-3%3D%282y-7%29%2B10%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%203y-3%3D2y%2B3%5Cimplies%20y-3%3D3%5Cimplies%20%5Cblacksquare~~%20y%3D6%20~~%5Cblacksquare%20~%5Chfill%20%5Cblacksquare~~%20%5Cstackrel%7B2%286%29~~%20-%20~~7%7D%7Bx%3D5%7D%20~~%5Cblacksquare)
The answer should be B and A
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope of line passing through (2, 7) and (1, -2) = (-2-7)/(1-2) = 9
Yes because they both have the same degrees, but one is slightly rotated