Answer:
Wholistic Health Services Co.
Income Statement for the year end February 28, 2019
Service Revenue $270,900
Less: Supplies Expense <u>$3,000 </u>
Gross Income $267,900
Less operating Expenses:
Insurance Expense $4,000
Depreciation Expense $9,000
Miscellaneous Expense $6,000
Utilities Expense $1,760
Rent Expense $4,200
Wages Expense <u>$213,000</u>
<u>$237,960</u>
Net Income <u>$29,940 </u>
Explanation:
Income statement shows the performance of the company in a year. It provides the details of revenue, expenses and profits for the year. All the expenses are deducted from the revenue to determine the net earning of the business.
Answer:
D. All of the above.
Explanation:
Full employment describes an economic situation where every able and willing worker is employed. It represents a situation where the highest possibles numbers of unskilled and skilled people are in employment. In practice, full employment is when the economy attains the optimal levels of unemployment.
At full employment, the unemployment rate will be above zero percent. The reason is that the economy will always have as frictional unemployment. Frictional unemployment is the time it takes for an individual to find their ideal job. Structural and frictional unemployment contribute about 2 to 3 percent of unemployment in the economy. Economists thus consider a 3 percent unemployment as full employment.
Answer:
Resize Objects and Relocate Objects
Explanation:
I did it :)))))
300 X $690 = $207,000
432 X $590 = $254,880
Hope this helps!
STSN
The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
