<span>((Current value - original value) / original value) x 100 = rate of return
</span><span>(( 1.65402- 1.62) / 0.157) x 100 = Original Value
</span>Original Value = $ 21.66
<span>
</span>
B. Decreases
if demand goes down, nobody is buying anything, so the need to produce/manufacture is down
Due to the greatest cost of goods sold, the LIFO (Last In Last Out) technique displays the lowest net profitability. Compared to the other techniques of inventory valuation, the cost of goods sold for the LIFO approach is the greatest.
<h3>Which technique of inventory valuation will result in the lowest net profit?</h3>
The application of LIFO will produce the lowest net income and the greatest estimated cost of goods sold among the three options during periods of inflation.
<h3>Which method of inventory has the lowest income tax rate?</h3>
LIFO is the inventory cost flow method that yields the lowest income tax liability. A form of inventory cost flow mechanism called last-in-first-out (LIFO) operates under the presumption that the last item acquired will be the first item to be sold.
<h3>In an era of inflation, which inventory method results in the lowest income tax?</h3>
Due to increasing COGS, LIFO leads to reduced net income (and taxes). However, under LIFO during inflation, there are fewer inventory write-downs. Results from average cost are in the middle of FIFO and LIFO.
To Know more about techniques
brainly.com/question/13655064
#SPJ4
Answer:
$575.82.
Explanation:
Since Thomas owes $ 438 on his credit card, but only paid the minimum of $ 20, his debt is now $ 418 (438 - 20). A late fee of $ 39 will be added to this value, which will raise said sum to $ 457 (418 + 39). In turn, the interest rate for unpaid card balances is 26% per month. Therefore, next month his balance will be $ 575.82 (457 x 1.26).
Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.