The inequality to determine the number of runs per inning, p Kim's team could have scored is; 4r + 6 > 17
<h3>How to write an Inequality?</h3>
Let r represent the number of runs per inning. Thus for 4 innings, we have 4r.
The team already has 6 runs. Now add the additional runs to this to get;
4r + 6
The team wants to score more than the other team, this means they need more than 17 and so the inequality required is;
4r + 6 > 17
Subtract 6 from each side to get;
4r + 6 - 6 > 17 - 6
4r > 11
Divide both sides by 4 to get:
r > 2.75
Approximating to a whole number gives;
r > 3
Read more about writing inequalities at; brainly.com/question/25275758
#SPJ1
Answer:
3:5 <em>the colon is needed to represent the ratio</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
r = 10
g = 4
y = 30 - 14 = 6
y = 6
so ratio of total balls is 10:4:6
and ratio of y:r is
6:10
simply by dividing by 2
3:5
Answer:
100:100
Step-by-step explanation:
100 reds and 100 blues are in there
Yes it can be a direct variation. it follows the form y = kx
The only variable that cannot be held constant is F, but we can hold the mass constant and vary the acceleration OR we can hold the acceleration constant and vary the mass. Either one would work, but the easiest would be to vary the mass and hold the acceleration constant since we are all pulled by the same action gravity
To calculate the square root, you can either use the √symbol on a calculator or you can manually find it using Prime Factorization. For non-perfect squares, Prime Factorization is the way to go.
The first two steps work for solving large perfect squares as well.
1. Divide your number into perfect square factors.
2. Take the square roots of your perfect square factors.
3. If your number doesn't factor perfectly, reduce your answer to simplest terms.
4. If needed, estimate. In some cases if you have memorized some of the square roots, you can estimate where the number would be.
ie.

you know that

and

, so you can estimate that the

would be between 7 and 8 but closer to 8.
5. <span>Alternatively, reduce your number to its lowest common factors as your first step.</span><span> Finding perfect square factors isn't necessary if you can easily determine a number's prime factors (factors that are also prime numbers).
ie. </span>

=

=

=

Hope this helped!!!