The answer is: When students believed the exam would be implemented the following year, both the expertise of the source and the quality of the arguments equally influenced their attitudes.
This happen because the student's argument is extremely influenced by whether they could be involved in the comprehensive exam.
If the exam would be implemented in the following year, the students are very likely to face the exam themselves. This make them much more likely to have negative attitudes toward the idea.
If the exam would be implemented in the next 10 years, the students wouldn't have to face it. Therefore, their attitude would be less negative toward the comprehensive exam.
<span>Facet of openness to experience</span>
Answer:the decline in confidence in financial institutions
Explanation:
When there are financial crisis people never really know what is going to happen with financial institutions, they may shut down improperly and people may lose a lot of money and find themselves hustling lawsuit trying to get it back , only to find that financial institutions are bankrupt and can't refund them so there is always that fear and people will choose to take their money out.
