Answer: A) greater rights for common people.
Rousseau argued for a democratic government to rule developed countries. He claimed that the government was in place only through an implicit social contract between the people and the government. This contract ensured that the needs of the people for safety and resources were fulfilled in exchange for the loss of some of their liberties.
However, he argued that in most systems, this contract was broken, because the government was not fulfilling its side of the bargain. According to Rousseau, the power and sovereignty of the country laid with the common people. Therefore, the fulfillment of their common needs and desires (the common will) was the main goal of the state.
This could have a variety of impacts that this situation could have on the local market. Firstly, the introduction of a Chinese company would mean that there would more competition for the American solar power company which would then have to contend with the Chinese company for sales. They would then be in a race to bring the most affordable options to the consumers as well as new advances in the technology or greater service. This would mean that the consumers would benefit greatly from this situation as they would be getting better products and service for an affordable cost.
Also, both companies could have a working arrangement where they act as an oligopoly and dominate the solar power industry in that particular market. Although, more companies brings more competition, when there aren't a multiplicity of competitors, there is always the danger that the few businesses will band together and operate as one entity where they set specific prices, standards of service and technological advances introduced. They would only superficially be competing with each other. In this arrangement, the consumers would endure the same standard as having one entity dominating the market.
Another scenario would be where the American solar power company makes a superior product and as such would promote their products to the market as 'higher end' which would ensure they have a core and stable consumer base.
The 26th Amendment allows those who turn 18 years old, the legal right to vote. So, if we did not have the 26th Amendment, technically speaking, anyone would be allowed to vote at any age. This could render elections unfair, as families with more children than others would have more voting power.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Humoral theory".
Explanation:
- It often described as humorism or even the idea of the four humors became a metaphor for the human body's functioning.
- Within humoral philosophy, the therapies for illness were about maintaining equilibrium. This may be fairly healthy and based on improvements in eating patterns, activity and herbal medications.
Therefore, it's the right answer.