Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
Answer: A - peak
Explanation:
Just took the test the other answer is wrong!!!
Answer:
- Exrpress understanding and explain why his/her demand is not acceptable.
Explanation:
When dealing with a <em>customer</em>, and you consider he/she is not rigth, you should be able to express your point of view in a respectful way but clearly preserving your rights. That is <em>assertiveness</em>.
You must confront him/her in a constructively way: make it clear why the claim is not correct or fair, even how it affects the your or the company's right: you undersant him/her but he/she must understand you too.
You should prevent the situation from escalating to greater proportions but you should not give in to unfair demands that involve a loss for the company.
Answer:
c. unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Under the first amendment the act of banning such printed materials is unconstitutional. As it is not good for people in the country to witness such things.
As printed material includes books, magazines, and other things which enhance the knowledge level of different people.
Therefore, banning printed material will make the country people short of knowledgeable resources.
Therefore, the court will announce it unconstitutional.
