The answer is -10 after replacing x with 3 u get that answer
Answer:
5/6 cups of chocolate chips
Step-by-step explanation:
According to a recipe , 2 1/2 * c * u * p chocolate chips are needed to make a large batch of cookies. Manuel decided to make only 1/3 of the cookies . How many cups of chocolate chips will Manuel need ?
From the above question:
1 batch of cookies = 2 1/2 cups of chocolate chips
1/3 batch of cookies = x
Cross Multiply
x = 1/3 × 2 1/2
x = 1/3 × 5/2
x = 5/6 cups of chocolate chips
Hence, Manuel would need 5/6 cups of chocolate chips for 1/3 bath of cookies.
Answer:
Answer:
Kaya's answer is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of dots in successive figures are
8, 16, 24.
So Kaya's solution 8n is correct.
When n = 1, first square = 8*1 = 8 dots
n = 2: second square = 8*2 = 16
n = 3, 3rd square = 8*3 = 24.
If I have interpreted Kianna's formula correctly
for n = 1, then the number of dots = 2(1+ 1)^2 - 2(1 - - 1)^2
= 0.
The conclusion regarding the publisher's claim regarding the hypothesis is that have sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion is less than 30% of their readers own a Rolls Royce.
<h3>What is a null hypothesis?</h3>
The null hypothesis is a statistical theory that suggests that no statistical relationship and significance exists in a set of given single observed variable, between two sets of observed data and measured phenomena.
Since we reject the null hypothesis , we have sufficient evidence to support the claim. In this case, we have sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion is less than 30% of their readers own a Rolls Royce.
Learn more about hypothesis on:
brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A newsletter publisher believes that less than 30% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.02 level of significance, the advertiser decides to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim?
The missing side length is approximately 99.84 m