Answer:
Now, it is called a building because the 'ing' in the English language is added to certain verbs to make them nouns. The verb 'built' is suffixed with 'ing' to make the thing a noun- Building.
Explanation:
Helping the client identify positive coping mechanisms is therapeutic role the nurse is acting when a client is working toward the prevention of an alcohol abuse relapse.
A few positive coping mechanisms include meditating, responsibility, emotionally supportive relationships, expressing distressing emotions etc. A therapeutic role is when clients are helped in treating psychological disorders, alleviating painful responses or symptoms resulting from a distressing condition.
When an individual drinks too much alcohol and too often that is when it is called alcohol abuse. A few common signs and indications of alcohol abuse are slurred speech, poor coordination, memory impairment, unable to stop drinking etc.
An alcohol relapse is when people start reverting back to old drinking habits and stops maintaining goals to reduce use of alcohol.
Learn more about alcohol abuse relapse here:
brainly.com/question/13987747
#SPJ4
Quackery is the health fraud, which uses fraudulent advertisements and misinterpreted information, medical practices, for the promotion of products. So, in your case, the correct answer is B, i.e., <span>the provider's success claims seem too good to be true. </span>
(This is only my opinion by the way, so you can change anything you want)
I think that Amy should stay out of it personally, but find a way to report the doctor for bringing his religious beliefs into his MEDICAL job. It seems like it would be her responsibility as a proffesional to make sure the patient gets to do what she thinks is right. Dr. Williams shouldn't have to tell his patients about his religious beliefs, because it shouldn't matter in a MEDICAL practice. There is both an ethical and legal problem with his action. A patient should get to make their own choices unless they want to endanger themsleves or others. That is wrong ethically that he took away someone's control over that choice. Opinions and beliefs shouldn't come into this kind of thing. Legally, it is wrong for the same reason. He has no right to do that unless someone's health is at risk.
