Answer:
Part a
2021 = $7,000
2022 = $6,000
Part b
2021 = $5,250
Explanation:
Sum of the year`s digit method provide for higher depreciation in early life of the asset with lower depreciation in later years.
Step 1
<em>Some of digits calculation :</em>
Year Digits
2021 7
2022 6
2023 5
2024 4
2025 3
2026 2
2027 1
Total 28
Step 2
<em>Determine the depreciable amount</em>
Depreciable amount = Cost - Residual value
= $40,000 - $12,000
= $28,000
Step 3
<em>Depreciation expense calculations</em>
2021 = 7 / 28 x $28,000 = $7,000
2022 = 6/ 28 x $28,000 = $6,000
assuming the equipment was purchased on March 31, 2021
2021 = $7,000 x 9/12 = $5,250
Most time, it is reasonable to refer to the opportunity cost as the price because it entails the benefit of the foregone good or service.
<h3>
What is an opportunity cost?</h3>
It refers to a value of what is rejected in order to perform the chosen alternative, that is, the value one have to give up to buy what you want in terms of other goods or services.
Therefore, it is sometimes reasonable to refer to the opportunity cost as the price because it entails the benefit of the foregone good or service.
Read more about opportunity cost
<em>brainly.com/question/1549591</em>
#SPJ1
The answer is C because i just took the test and the answer was C so put C down and i bet 100% you'll get it right
International trade has been significant for the globalization of free trade relations.
Explanation:
International trade has been responsible for the global economic growth in the 20th and 21st century .
International trade is responsible for the specialization of goods for one country which is at the most advantage for making that particular product while being able to import the others they may need
International trade makes it so that the types of goods and services available around the world can reach any other part of the world.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Choices that are the best for more than one person are said to be in the social interest.
Explanation:
The social interest is a concept sufficiently clarified in Company Law. The Capital Companies Law refers to it in terms of challenging social agreements: if an agreement is not in accordance with the corporate interest, it can be challenged. It is only negatively contested, that is, if the plaintiff can argue that the agreement is contrary to the social interest, so that it is not a validity requirement that the agreement be in accordance with the social interest. Likewise, if the administrators act against the social interest when they exercise their discretionary powers, they incur responsibility for violation of their duty of loyalty.
