Answer: A. Kingston may be held liable to Remstat because he usurped a corporate opportunity.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the correct option is that Kingston may be held liable to Remstat because he usurped a corporate opportunity.
Usurpation of a corporate opportunity is typically regarded as a form of breach of duty and it arises when a worker in a particular company uses the information that he has for his own personal gain.
In this case, Kingston is the 100 percent shareholder of KKIM and uses the information that he has regarding the sabres to his benefit.
Therefore, the correct option is A.
Answer:
D) lower-income taxpayers and middle-income taxpayers.
Explanation:
The rental real estate exemption allows taxpayers who are not real estate professionals, to deduct up to $25,000 of real estate loss per year.
This exemption applies for taxpayers with an adjusted gross income of $150,000 or less. Only those that have an AGI of less than $100,000 are able to deduct the full $25,000 exemption, but as their AGI increase, the exemption starts to phase out.
The two basic requirements for qualifying for this exemption is that the individual actively participates in the management of the real estate property that generated the loss and that they own at least a 10% interest in the property.
Answer:
iiwjebendj
Explanation:
8sidnfbbfndjdijsnennejrjfjrjej
Answer:
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this communication is violating the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. This Act was passed prohibiting any contract, trust, or conspiracy in restraint of interstate or foreign trade in order to prevent oppressive business practices and monopolies. This is what the two companies are doing by agreeing to jointly raise the price they are able to control the entire markets price thus creating a monopoly in the automotive industry, which forces consumers to pay a lot more than what the vehicles are actually worth.
