Answer:
No.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because if one event happens before the other, the odds of the other event happening will change due to less cards being left to pick from.
Consider the scenario where 4 of a kind all contained 10's from the deck.
The possibility of a full-house with a 10 in the pile would be zero if there were no 10's left after the four of a kind turn had been made. Thus, since the four of a kind affects the probability of the full house, and vice versa, they are both dependent on each other and hence not exclusive events.
Answer:
I think that it is 26, 51, 103,
I hope this is correct sorry if I'm wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
you add all of them together and they have to get to 180 so 26+51=77 77+103=180
Answer:
Observe the attached image
Step-by-step explanation:
The inequality we have is:

This means that the region represented by this inequality includes all the values below the horizontal line
.
To graph this region, draw a dotted horizontal line that intersects the y axis at
. Then shade all the region that is below the horizontal line, as shown in the attached image.
Answer:
x = 1035 = MXXXV
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Roman Numbers
</u>
It's an ancient number system developed in Rome where numbers are represented by the letters {I,V,X,L,C,D,M}. The value of each are, respectively {1,5,10,50,100,500,1000}. If some letter is repeated, then it's value must be multiplied by the number of times the letter is present. For example, XXVII has two X's and two I's, so the conversion is 10+10+5+1+1=27.
If a less-valued letter appears before a greater one, it subtracts. For example CDI=-100+500+1=401
Our numbers are
MMMMMMMMCDXV=8*1000-100+500+10+5=8415
MDCCCLXIII = 1000+500+300+50+10+3=1863
DLXI = 500+50+10+1=561
XXVII = 20+5+2=27
We now operate in our numerical system




Converting back to roman

Answer:
Additive inverse: a+(-a)=0
Additive identity: a+0=a
Multiplicative inverse: a•1/a=1
Multiplicative identity: a•1=a
Step-by-step explanation: