Answer: As India was the major source of raw materials for all England industries like agriculture, import-export.
Explanation:
India was seen by Britain as a potential supplier of raw materials to supply England's manufacturing. The economy of India at the time was heavily based on agriculture.
Because the British modernized and industrialized India, the lack of financial benefits from their rule caused many economic declines in India, and Indians developed a sense of nationalism after the British took control of the country, So, there were both positive and negative impacts.
King Charles II of England granted the British East India Company the freedom to govern their Indian holdings as they saw fit around 1670. He granted them authority over the production of money, the direction of armies and fortresses, the formation of alliances, the conduct of war and peace, and the imposition of laws within their own domains.
To learn more about British rule in India-
brainly.com/question/28320113
brainly.com/question/9667740
because the English don't like that the colonies are trading directly with Spain and France.
Answer:
"Attacking radical abolitionists to boost his credibility with moderate southerners, Webster urged northerners to respect slavery in the South and to assist in the return of fugitive slaves to their owners. He joined Clay in warning that the Union could never be dismembered peacefully." -
Explanation:
The cataracts kept lower Egypt from coming up the Nile to trade. It made trade decline between the two.
Answer:
According to Edwin Lemert, <u>secondary</u> deviance occurs when social reaction intensifies with each act of primary deviance, and the offender becomes stigmatized, accepting the truth of the label.
Explanation:
Edwin Lemert in 1951 stated that secondary deviance is the process of a deviant identity, integrating it into conceptions of self, potentially affecting the individual long term.
