Answer:
Explanation:
When we accelerate in a car on a straight path we tend to lean backward because our lower body part which is directly in contact with the seat of the car gets accelerated along with it but the upper the upper body experiences this force later on due to its own inertia. This force is accordance with Newton's second law of motion and is proportional to the rate of change of momentum of the upper body part.
Conversely we lean forward while the speed decreases and the same phenomenon happens in the opposite direction.
While changing direction in car the upper body remains in its position due to inertia but the lower body being firmly in contact with the car gets along in the direction of the car, seems that it makes the upper body lean in the opposite direction of the turn.
On abrupt change in the state of motion the force experienced is also intense in accordance with the Newton's second law of motion.
Answer:
Such limitations are given below.
Explanation:
- Each pn junction provides limited measurements of maximum forwarding current, highest possible inversion voltage as well as the maximum output level.
- If controlled within certain adsorption conditions, the pn junction could very well offer satisfying performance.
- In connector operation, the maximum inversion voltage seems to be of significant importance.
The answer true I’m guessing. It’s a 50/50 chance
Answer:
A. absorb heat energy and move farther apart
Explanation:
The answer is A since when a ice cube takes in heat, it changes form and melts down to a liquid : water.
The molecules in water are farther apart since they are moving around alot but can be contained in a container.
Answer:
E = k Q / [d(d+L)]
Explanation:
As the charge distribution is continuous we must use integrals to solve the problem, using the equation of the elective field
E = k ∫ dq/ r² r^
"k" is the Coulomb constant 8.9875 10 9 N / m2 C2, "r" is the distance from the load to the calculation point, "dq" is the charge element and "r^" is a unit ventor from the load element to the point.
Suppose the rod is along the x-axis, let's look for the charge density per unit length, which is constant
λ = Q / L
If we derive from the length we have
λ = dq/dx ⇒ dq = L dx
We have the variation of the cgarge per unit length, now let's calculate the magnitude of the electric field produced by this small segment of charge
dE = k dq / x²2
dE = k λ dx / x²
Let us write the integral limits, the lower is the distance from the point to the nearest end of the rod "d" and the upper is this value plus the length of the rod "del" since with these limits we have all the chosen charge consider
E = k 
We take out the constant magnitudes and perform the integral
E = k λ (-1/x)
Evaluating
E = k λ [ 1/d - 1/ (d+L)]
Using λ = Q/L
E = k Q/L [ 1/d - 1/ (d+L)]
let's use a bit of arithmetic to simplify the expression
[ 1/d - 1/ (d+L)] = L /[d(d+L)]
The final result is
E = k Q / [d(d+L)]
