Answer:
We use Conditional tenses to talk about hypothetic situations in the future, in the past, and to talk about events that would have happened.
a. If we were to be hit by an iceberg, we would die.
b If my cat were to eat a mouse, it would be a predator.
c If I were never to go in the sun, I would be extremely pale.
Explanation:
Conditional tenses communicate hypothetical situations in the past, theories about what might have happened, what happens concerning facts that are always true, and events with a low probability to occur in the future.
The sentences in this exercise are using conditionals to talk about situations in the present or future that probably will not happen.
We use:
the word if + the subject + were to,.... + subject + would + verb in the infinitive....
In formal writing, we can use the subjects he, she, and it with the auxiliary were instead of was and then the verb in the infinitive. For example, If he were to fail his test, he would be sad.
Hope that helpful --------------------------------------
Answer:
I personally just read slower than i normally do and make sure I am able to feel sure about what I am reading.
Explanation:
Answer:
C). I thought it would be fun to wake up early. But when my alarm went off at four o'clock AM, I thought, "Nope, the early bird can just have that worm."
Explanation:
As per the question, the third option exemplifies the most appropriate way to format as per the Basic Style Guide. It does not involve the informal phrases like 'you know, I was like' which signals that it <u>complies with the standard rules(punctuation, grammar, etc.)</u> in order to communicate the intended message clearly and effectively to the specific audience. The other options fail to create that impact. Hence, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
It is feautrured in Songs of Experience because the poem talks about the experience of a tiger. It is a suspense poem. Indeed, the life of a tiger is full of suspenses. The poem's opening lines are:
<em>Tyger Tyger, burning bright,
</em>
<em>In the forests of the night;
</em>
<em>What immortal hand or eye,
</em>
<em>Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
</em>
The poet praises the the qualities of the tiger by asking questions without answering them. In the remaining lines of the poem, the author continues praising the perfectness of the animal, calling it dark craftsmanship. The thought-provoking point is about the comparison between <em>The Tyger</em> and the previous poem <em>The Lamb </em>which the poet himself doubts that the same God could create innocent spirit like a lamb and such a fierce animal like tiger at the same time. or it could be interpreted as God's different expressions showing his kindness in the face of lamb and his anger in the qualities of tiger.
