It would depend on what n was equal to
Answer:
He must win 11 more matches to qualify for the bonus.
Step-by-step explanation:
24/36 * 100 = 67% (to the nearest %) - This is the current percentage of what the Tennis player has won.
If we add 14 more matches on to the 36 the player has already played, we know that the Tennis player plays 50 matches in total.
Let's say the Tennis player was playing 100 matches, they would need to win 70 or more to qualify for the bonus. Because the player is playing half this amount of matches, we half the amount of games they have to win...
35/50 games or more must be won to qualify for the bonus. The Tennis player has already won 24 matches, so must win 11 more matches to qualify for the bonus.
Hope that helps!
You should suck a long rod and the answer is around 50 minutes
Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1
