The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem
<h3>What is the angle theorem used?</h3>
We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.
Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.
In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.
Read more about Angle theorem at; brainly.com/question/24839702
#SPJ1
<span>A)Both m(x) and p(x) cross the x-axis at 7.
B)Both m(x) and p(x) cross the y-axis at 7.
C)Both m(x) and p(x) have the same output value at x = 7.
D)Both m(x) and p(x) have a maximum or minimum value at x = 7.
m(x) = p(x) at x = 7
</span><span>
True statement about x = 7.
C)Both m(x) and p(x) have the same output value at x = 7. </span><span>
</span>
Answer:
y= 3/4x
Step-by-step explanation:
Points on the graph
the equation based on the difference in points:
Answer:
8 seed packets
Step-by-step explanation:
you just need to have half the amount of seed packets of the number of tomato plants grown
