Pretty much, the Communists were much stronger than the Nationalists. Their public support was strong due to promised land reform for peasants and their military organization was more experienced. The Nationalists had weak, public support and their military was ineffective, corrupt leadership and poor morale. They were an easy beat.
Hope this helps :)
The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States. I do think the Articles of Confederation was not a solid plan for the new nation. it was known to have some flaws that outweigh it usefulness.
- The Articles of Confederation might not work for the new nation because the weakness of the Articles of Confederation was great such that Congress was able to enforce laws or raise taxes. This made it so hard for the new nation to repay their debts gotten during the Revolutionary War.
It was regarded a failure because it did not grant enough power to the federal government. The Constitutional Convention was made so as to addressed the problems under the Articles.
As the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation became obvious, the Congress needed a way to address the issues.
Learn more about Articles of Confederation from
brainly.com/question/13152253
They made genocide possible by oppressing the Jewish people and by keeping the operation underground. Not many countries actually knew about the holocaust which is why it was able to be prolonged, Americans didn't even know about it until we actually invaded Germany.
Answer:
Explanation:
I just answered the question and it was correct