The constitution requires a -thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached respectable upon conviction is elimination from the workplace.
In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from protecting public offices inside the destiny. There may be no enchantment.
Article II, phase 4: The President, vice chairman, and all civil officials of the usa, shall be removed from the workplace on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or different excessive Crimes and Misdemeanors. See, e.g., Va.
The constitution offers the residence of Representatives the only energy to impeach an official, and it makes the Senate the only court for impeachment trials. The power of impeachment is confined to elimination from the workplace but also offers a means by which an eliminated officer may be disqualified from preserving future office.
Learn more about constitution here: brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
Answer:
In sex crimes, the victim interview is usually your main evidence and your main source of evidence leads, more so than with any other crime. At the same time, the sex crime victim's telling of their stories is usually much more inhibited, guarded, and vulnerable to distortion than for victims of other crimes. Complicating the picture even more, no other crime victim interview tends to make the interviewer feel more uncertain about how best to proceed.DON'T - start your interview without again dedicating three or four minutes solely to addressing the victim's needs and concerns.
Sex crimes victims almost always arrive at the interview plagued with shame, anxieties, misinformation, and with fears of being judged. Even more significant, they usually come to these interviews still very uncertain about whether or not they really want to be going forward with the justice process.
This state of mind is in stark contrast, for example, to a robbery victim who is completely unconflicted about their outrage and can't wait to get the story on the record. As long as these anxieties and uncertainties of sex crimes victims remain unaddressed, chances are they're going to be very hesitant and holding back.
Explanation:
I think ur answer might be yellow
Answer:
Explanation:
Appeal:
An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.
Appellant:
An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.
Appellee:
An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.
Harmless error:
Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.
Injunction:
An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.
Interlocutory appeal:
An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.
Mandamus:
A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.
Writ of certiorari:
A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").
Answer:
The evidence that must be preserved is limited to evidence that would be both material and exculpatory. Evidence is material if it is relevant to an important issue in the case, and evidence is exculpatory if it supports a defense or tends to show that the defendant is not guilty of the crime.
Explanation:
This might not answer your question, but this was from the wedsite below......
https://www.justia.com
