Answer:
Tendency to engage in charity is strongest for religious individuals were religious behavior is a matter of personal choice.
Explanation:
A religious individual
This is often refered to as someone who tries in every possible way to live his or her life in accordance with his or her faith. Those who regularly engages in religious activities is termed "religious".
Religion
This is often known as an organized and collective belief or faith system.
Intrinsic religiosity
This kind of religiosity deals with the fact that it is an individual's primary motive in life and it is the driving force in their life while Extrinsic religiosity is religiosity motivated by external, non-religious rewards.
Helping is the act of rendering assistance to fellow human being especially those of the same faith.
Religion is not enforced but mostly a matter of personal choice. One can decide to be in it or not. Religious people most times are actively involved in charity so as to render help,draw people to their faith or make the world a better place.
Answer:Not too much
Explanation:Every US responsibility is put to the good of humanity. Those responsibilities is what makes America The best Country in the World in financially and technologically.
The Pima and Hopi were part of the Indian culture. The Hopi
are thought to have descended from the Anasazi and they are classified as
Pueblo Indians. The Pima’s on the other hand are thought to have descended from
the Hohokam culture. Though they have descended from different cultures but
they are part of the Indian culture. The Pima’s, mostly resided in the region
which is now known as the central and southern Arizona. The Hopi tribe on the
other hand lived in the northeastern Arizona.
First of all, you dont have the answers.
But the answer is "Companies replaced hand-operated brakes with air brakes on trains" is the best answer because this stopped many of the fatalities that were caused by brake failures." which is I say on what you are using D
One major drawback of using experiments is that the outcome might not be the outcome that is desired or another one is that it has a low realism and that experiments wont find out or specify 'why' the outcome occurred
