Answer:
c.) It ended housing discrimination in King County.
Explanation:
The 1968 act enlarged on acts and forbid discrimination regarding the rental and financing of houses based on race, sex, or religion.
Answer:
The Court upheld the statute only in the case of states that could provide matching funds; and if matching funds could not be provided.
Explanation:
The case was resolved 7-2 with the majority vote wrote by the Chief Justice William Rehnquist. It stated that the statue was a valid interpretation of the Spending Clause and that it was not unconstitutional. Congress has the authority of regulating the spends but not till the point they applied coercion.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
- move for a new trial—that is, ask the judge to set aside the jury’s verdict, declare a mistrial, and start over, or
- appeal or seek a writ, which means asking a higher court to reverse a conviction (court of appeal)
- could possibly hire a private detective to review the case to see if there is any evidence to show he is innocent, if this is successful, a retrial can be put in place?
Explanation:
Answer:
Investigate.
Explanation:
So you are asking for the blank?
Answer:
faulty eyewitness testimony.
Explanation:
its less likely to be a problem in trials involving more serious crimes such as murder.
the malleable nature of human memory and visual perception makes eyewitness testimony one of the most unreliable forms of evidence.